AI doesn't cite you
When a user asks an LLM about your category, you may be invisible — even if you rank #1 on Google.
If you're not in the top 3 AI answers, you don't exist for the buyer. Onswer audits 8+ LLMs in 90 seconds, free with no card. Paid monitoring starts at $19 — a third of what Otterly charges, a quarter of Profound.
AI models
markets
seconds
to start
Visibility
+12% this week
Models queried
Next action
Add FAQPage schema on /pricing
Claude cites pricing comparisons in 6 answers but never cites notion.so.
0
audits run
0
brands monitored weekly
0
AI queries this week
In 2026, your buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini before Google. If AI doesn't mention you, you don't exist for them.
When a user asks an LLM about your category, you may be invisible — even if you rank #1 on Google.
AI consistently recommends a small handful of brands per niche. If you're not one of them, every AI conversation is a lost lead.
AI search optimisation (AEO/GEO) is the new SEO of 2026. The brands that act first build a moat that compounds for years.
We get confused with social listening tools because everyone says "brand monitoring". The distinction matters — what we measure, what we fix, and what you pay for is different.
Not like · Brandwatch, Mention, Sprout Social, Talkwalker, Meltwater
We do not monitor mentions on Twitter, Reddit, news articles, or social media. If a journalist tweets about you, we don't care.
Not like · Ahrefs, Semrush, Moz
We do not track your Google rankings, keyword positions, or backlink profile. Those tools measure URL rankings; we measure brand mentions inside AI answers.
Not like · Hootsuite Insights, Brand24
We don't score whether the internet feels happy or angry about your brand. We score whether AI assistants name you at all when buyers ask.
Same category as · Profound, OtterlyAI, AthenaHQ
Same category, more LLMs covered (8+ vs their 2–3), multi-geo, brand-specific recommendations, a third of the price. AEO / GEO is the discipline; this is the tool.
Just your URL + email. We do the rest in 90 seconds.
GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Llama, Mistral. Across 3 markets. Real prompts a real buyer would type.
Not "improve SEO". Specific actions tied to specific patterns in the audit. Quick / moderate / heavy effort tagged.
No sign-up, no card. Just a real audit we ran against a brand you probably know. Click any score to open the full report.
notion.so
Strong AI presence
Open full audit
linear.app
Top mentions, weak comparison
Open full audit
onswer.app
Our own dogfood — category mismatch found
Open full audit
↓ Sample recommendation from a real audit ↓
LLMs cited Jira 27 times in comparison contexts but only mentioned Linear once. A dedicated comparison page with ComparisonTable + FAQPage schema would surface Linear in queries like "best Jira alternatives for engineering teams" — currently dominated by Asana and ClickUp.
Every major LLM your buyer might be asking. With more added as they launch.
The free audit shows where you stand today. Solo, Pro and Agency tell you when it changes — and what changed — so you don't have to refresh manually.
84/100
Visibility
Score-over-time chart
See your AI visibility evolve weekly. Spot the day a model retrained and forgot you. Catch competitors moving in.
To: founder@yourdomain.com
Your Onswer weekly · Score 84 ↑3 vs last week
Score: 84/100 (↑3)
New mentions: Claude · 2 new positive citations in "vs Profound" queries
Lost mentions: Gemini · 1 mention dropped in pricing queries
New competitor seen: AlternativeAI
View full report →
Sunday email digest
A 30-second email every Monday: your score, the diff vs last week, top wins, new competitors. Tap-to-share with your team.
New mentions
Claude · "best AI search tool" (was #3, now #1)
ChatGPT · "Profound alternatives" (new mention)
Lost mentions
Gemini · "AEO tools 2026" (lost mention)
New competitor
CompetitorX · mentioned in 4 Claude answers
Week-over-week diff
The single insight that justifies the subscription: AI visibility shifts every week. We show you exactly what moved, in which model, on which queries.
Early adopters running real audits on their own brands. Names redacted at their request — the data is real.
Onswer showed me ChatGPT was recommending 4 of my competitors when buyers searched for "AEO tools". Two weeks after adding FAQ + comparison schema, I dropped into 3 of those answers.
Profound wanted $399/month for 3 LLMs in their Growth plan. Onswer covers all 8 for $79, the recos are tied to my actual audit — and the score-over-time chart is what I check Sunday mornings.
We run Onswer audits on every new agency client before kickoff. The "what changed" weekly diff is the artifact that justifies our retainer to clients now.
Same category, very different ladders. Pricing verified against each vendor's public pricing page in May 2026 — the comparison is honest, including where competitors beat us.
*Pricing reflects each vendor's public entry and mid tiers as listed in May 2026. Profound and AthenaHQ have higher enterprise tiers not shown. Otterly's 50+ country coverage is real; we currently cover 13 — expanding.
Anyone can run one audit. The brands that win track the score every week and act on drops the same day.
One brand. Daily scans. 4 LLMs. The cheapest paid tier in the AI search visibility category.
Daily scans, all 8 LLMs, 13 geos, citation tracking, alerts. Beats Otterly's $189 plan.
Everything in Pro × 5 brands. White-label PDFs. Built for SEO and content agencies.
Cancel anytime. Annual billing saves 20%. Early-adopter discount applies to first 100 customers, locked in forever.
In Q4 2025 I asked GPT-4 for the best WordPress monitoring tools. Five competitors got named. Mine didn't. I had ranked #2 on Google for the same query for two years — none of that mattered. I spent the next 6 weeks building the audit you just ran. If you're stuck on AEO or want feedback on your audit, ping me on X — I read every message.
— Alain Porce
Founder · Onswer